I've always believed in the value of photography. And I've always believed in printing, framing, and displaying the images you create in your camera. But I have a confession. Up until last week, all the framed images in our home were printed via a lovely little company called Snapfish. Even our wedding photos. Photographers, please insert your gasps here ______.
Let me preface this by saying that there's absolutely nothing wrong with Snapfish. I printed through Snapfish for many many years and all the images in my scrapbooks (also printed through Snapfish) look just fine. However, now that I've learned just a thing or two about photography, I'm beginning to recognize the difference between a Snapfish print and a really good quality print.
You see, companies like Snapfish aren't the kind of companies professional photographers typically use. Why? One reason is because companies like Snapfish computer enhance the images they print. Which wouldn't be such a big deal, if I weren't already making my own adjustments to the images I shoot.
When I was just starting out as a photographer, I shot some images of my family at my grandpa's funeral, perfected them in photoshop, and then ordered online via Snapfish. I wanted to frame them and give them as gifts for Christmas. When they came in the mail, I couldn't wait to open that Snapfish envelope and see the finished products. Because even when you already know exactly which photos you ordered ahead of time, seeing them in print is always a thrill. But when I saw the prints I'd ordered, the thrill was gone. Because they all looked horrible. Like really, really horrible. Especially on skin that I lightly retouched.
"Snapfish has really lost their touch...maybe their machine was broken" I said to J. And the next day I took my disk of images to Target. Because Target is always good at everything, right? Wrong. The prints looked just as bad if not worse than the Snapfish prints. Especially because they were glossy. I'm not a fan of glossy. And it was then that I figured it out.
I took those same images to a printing company that one of my photographer friends recommended, spent a little more per print, and guess what- all the images looked exactly the way they did on my computer screen. And they didn't look horrible anymore. They looked amazing. And it was at that moment that I figured out the difference between a 9 cent print and a good quality print.
Last week I finally revamped all the framed prints in our home. And boy does it feel good! It looks pretty good too if I do say so myself. And I reselected and reprinted all our framed wedding images. Because Snapfish just wasn't doing them justice.
Let me preface this by saying that there's absolutely nothing wrong with Snapfish. I printed through Snapfish for many many years and all the images in my scrapbooks (also printed through Snapfish) look just fine. However, now that I've learned just a thing or two about photography, I'm beginning to recognize the difference between a Snapfish print and a really good quality print.
You see, companies like Snapfish aren't the kind of companies professional photographers typically use. Why? One reason is because companies like Snapfish computer enhance the images they print. Which wouldn't be such a big deal, if I weren't already making my own adjustments to the images I shoot.
When I was just starting out as a photographer, I shot some images of my family at my grandpa's funeral, perfected them in photoshop, and then ordered online via Snapfish. I wanted to frame them and give them as gifts for Christmas. When they came in the mail, I couldn't wait to open that Snapfish envelope and see the finished products. Because even when you already know exactly which photos you ordered ahead of time, seeing them in print is always a thrill. But when I saw the prints I'd ordered, the thrill was gone. Because they all looked horrible. Like really, really horrible. Especially on skin that I lightly retouched.
"Snapfish has really lost their touch...maybe their machine was broken" I said to J. And the next day I took my disk of images to Target. Because Target is always good at everything, right? Wrong. The prints looked just as bad if not worse than the Snapfish prints. Especially because they were glossy. I'm not a fan of glossy. And it was then that I figured it out.
I took those same images to a printing company that one of my photographer friends recommended, spent a little more per print, and guess what- all the images looked exactly the way they did on my computer screen. And they didn't look horrible anymore. They looked amazing. And it was at that moment that I figured out the difference between a 9 cent print and a good quality print.
Last week I finally revamped all the framed prints in our home. And boy does it feel good! It looks pretty good too if I do say so myself. And I reselected and reprinted all our framed wedding images. Because Snapfish just wasn't doing them justice.

We'd been saving this empty wall for all our favs from our rebranding photo session and I'm in love with the finished product!

















































